Danosky & Associates

Consulting for Non-profit Organizations

Join Our Mailing List
You are here: Home / Archives for Sharon Danosky

Connecticut Town Equity Reports Available through DataHaven

by

This series of reports is designed to inform local-level efforts to improve community well-being and racial equity. These reports disaggregate data from the 2020 Census, American Community Survey microdata files, DataHaven Community Wellbeing Survey record-level files, and other federal and state sources to create relevant town-level information that is not typically available from standard public databases.

DataHaven has published a town equity report for all 169 towns in Connecticut. These reports are extremely useful when you are doing strategic planning, preparing grant requests or looking to create more diversity when recruiting new board members.  I know I join with so many in the nonprofit sector in extending our appreciation to Data Haven.

Click here to access the reports for your catchment area.

The Ruling: Removing Affirmative Action from Education Institutions

by

We are Danosky & Associates are proud to share with you a recent blog posted by our dear friend and collaborator, Jenora Ledbetter of The Self-Care Network…

Dear Readers,

In today’s newsletter, we bring you a significant development that has sparked debates and discussions across the educational landscape. The ruling on the removal of affirmative action from education institutions has recently taken place, and it’s implications are being analyzed and examined by educators, policymakers, and the public alike.

In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court has ruled in favor of removing affirmative action policies from education institutions. This ruling has generated a wave of discussions regarding equal opportunities, diversity, and the future of education.

Affirmative action refers to policies that aim to address historical discrimination and promote equal opportunities for marginalized groups, particularly in education and employment. These policies often involve the consideration of race, gender, ethnicity, or other factors to ensure a more diverse and inclusive environment.

Those in favor of removing affirmative action argue that it perpetuates discrimination by treating individuals differently based on their race or ethnicity. They believe that admissions decisions should be based solely on merit and individual qualifications, rather than considering an applicant’s background.

Supporters of the ruling also argue that affirmative action can create an atmosphere of unfairness. They say that some individuals may feel disadvantaged due to their race or ethnicity, even if they are highly qualified. They believe that removing such policies will lead to a more equitable society by treating everyone on an equal basis.

On the other hand, opponents of the ruling express concerns about the potential consequences of removing affirmative action. They argue that without these policies, it will become more challenging to achieve diversity and equal representation in educational institutions. They believe that diversity brings valuable perspectives, enriches the educational experience, and prepares students for a diverse workforce.

Critics also contend that removing affirmative action may disproportionately affect underrepresented groups, widening existing disparities and perpetuating systemic inequalities. They emphasize the importance of addressing historical disadvantages and providing opportunities for those who have been historically marginalized.

Many organizations are asking if the new ruling will put a target on corporate diversity programs. They are also wondering how they can protect workplace diversity initiatives?  

First, it is important that employers understand that educational institutions are governed under Title VI, whereas organizations are governed under Title VII. These are two separate titles. The legal framework is not identical, and there are different legal standards that come into play.

Organizations should not be reactive or alarmist in their responses and they should not jump to conclusions and make any changes to their current or future DEI initiatives. Making any type of changes, can be counterproductive, and it can undermine and damage employees trust in the organization and make it harder for organizations to recruit a diverse team. It is crucial to acknowledge that promoting diversity and creating an inclusive work environment remains essential for a thriving and successful business.

The Self Care Network LLC is working with organizations to update their communication and strategic plans, as well as providing Title VII compliance program trainings which includes a holistic strategy to help organizations continue their diversity, equity, inclusion, and belonging efforts.  

This is an exciting time for organizations to conduct a thorough review of their current diversity initiatives to ensure they align with legal guidelines and promote fairness. Employers can continue to protect workplace diversity initiatives by embracing inclusive practices.

Remember, diversity is not just a compliance requirement, but a powerful driver of success in today’s global and interconnected world.

You can reach the CEO/Founder of The Self Care Network LLC with the contact information listed below

Jenora Ledbetter

203-441-5994

jenora@theselfcarenetwork.org

What Makes a Great Case for Support?

by

What Makes a Great Case for Support?

By Sharon Danosky

A Case for Support explains and documents the compelling reasons for a donor to give significantly to your organization.  It is a unique document, specific to fundraising.  And it is a very difficult document to prepare.  I’m not sure why that is so, though I do suspect it has something to do with clearly articulating why you are raising funds and how those funds will be used – and the type of impact raising the funds will have. 

Most organizations refer to their mission when raising funds.  Which is certainly a very good approach.  However, if you are going to ask a donor to make a significant investment – more is expected.  Which is why a case for support is similar to a document that might be used to convince people to invest in a for-profit venture – except that it should have more soul and even more accountability.

Developing a compelling Case for Support is one of the first tasks undertaken when considering a capital campaign.  It should lay out all the reasons people should invest in your organization by making a substantial contribution. There are many different approaches to developing a strong Case for Support.  I am going to share mine here.

First, start with your vision – what do you want the world to be like and how to you want the people (animals, plants, wildlife, etc.) to live in that world? The first tenet in fundraising is that people give to lofty visions – not needy organizations.  If you want to inspire magnificent philanthropy for your cause – you must have a magnificent vision.

Then there is the reality check – why aren’t people living their best life, what are the challenges they face and how does your organization address those challenges?  Share your history and your track record of success.  Also, share your challenges and difficulties.  After all, that’s why you’re raising money.

Eventually, you need to get very specific – if you raise $1, $2, $5, or $50 million or more – tell your donors how you will use the funds you raise and how will it make a difference.  This is often the most challenging part, I know, – getting down to the basics and identifying the potential impact in real terms. 

A good place to start writing your Case for Support is with your strategic plan.  What are your over-arching goals and how will you fund them?  As you – and your Board – begin to put the meat on the bones of your Case for Support, it will begin to evolve and create consensus around the reason for your campaign.  This is a great thing – because your entire organization needs to be behind this plan.

Many Cases for Support have multiple items that require support.  A typical Case may have a capital component, a program component, and even a reserve or endowment.  It provides donors with options and each should be thoroughly spelled out with how much money is needed for each and how the funds will be allocated.  Having these options does not necessarily mean people will designate their gifts (though they could) but usually is just a way of explaining how funds will be used.  Most donors still prefer to give “wherever the need is greatest” in a campaign.  

A Case for Support is usually a pretty lengthy document.  I know there are some who differ with that approach.  I am a strong believer that a Case is not a marketing piece – but a thorough discussion of your plans so that donors to a campaign can learn about the details, provide input, ask questions, and be assured that if they make a significant contribution it will be well-invested.  It can also serve as the basis for future marketing pieces, grants, etc.  Therefore, whatever space, whatever addendum items you want to include – go for it.  As long as it is well-written and not redundant.  And, of course, there should be a good Executive Summary so if someone only wants the highlights – they’re there.  Better too much information, than too little, in my opinion.

What Makes a Great Case for Support?  When the donor finishes reading it, they say “I get It.  My questions have been answered.  I want to invest!”

Spring 2023 – Principles of Fundraising Certificate Program

by

Now in its 15th year, the Principles of Fundraising series of workshops continues to provide high-caliber, basic-skills development in the art and science of fundraising for nonprofits. Created by the Connecticut Chapter of the Association of Fundraising Professionals (AFP), the series provides five introductory-level workshops focusing on the theory and practice of fundraising taught by AFP members who are experts in their respective fields. All sessions will be held virtually online using the Zoom platform.

  • Organizing and Running a Successful Development Program: Wednesday, April 12th (9:00-10:30am)
  • Building a Sustainable Annual Giving Program: Wednesday, April 19th (9:00-10:30am)
  • Grants from Foundations and Corporations: Wednesday, April 26th (9:00-11:00am)
  • Engaging Your Board & Volunteers to Raise Money: Wednesday, May 3rd (9:00-10:30am)
  • The Art of Soliciting Major Gifts: Wednesday, May 10th (9:00-10:30am)

Please register online here: http://www.cvent.com/d/f6q6rg.

BECOME A MEMBER!

Like what you see? There’s more where this came from!

Become a Danosky and Associates NPO member to gain unlimited access to our library of blogs, webinars, podcasts, articles, and our virtual consultant office hours that will help your nonprofit achieve your vision and fulfill your mission. Learn new strategies and skills, such as: how to integrate your vision, mission and long-term objectives, generate new systems for innovation, build a stronger board, create a compelling narrative, reach your fundraising goals, and plan financial scenarios; along with more special surprises throughout the year. For only $49 a month (or $450 a year), you can acquire the tools you need to build a better world.

LEARN MORE!

Membership Consulting for Non-Profits

Our Mission

We provide nonprofits the guidance, support and tools necessary to build a better world.

Our Vision

Every nonprofit will have the capacity to fulfill their missions and make the world a better place. 

Who We Are

Danosky & Associates is an action-oriented, results driven consulting firm that builds nonprofit capacity, applied through an equity lens with innovative strategies for an ever-emerging future. 

Join Our Mailing List